Beyond Ethnic Identity: Why Midwest State May Be a More Inclusive Name Than Edo State
By Dr. Odimientimi Agbedeyi
A fresh debate is gradually gaining momentum among political observers, historians, youth groups, and advocates of equity in Nigeria’s South-South region. At the heart of the discussion is a question many consider sensitive but worthy of examination: Should the name “Edo State” be reconsidered in favour of a more inclusive identity that reflects the state’s ethnic diversity?
Created in 1991 from the old Bendel State, Edo State is home to numerous ethnic nationalities, including the Bini, Esan, Afemai (Etsako, Owan and Akoko-Edo), Ijaw, and several other indigenous communities. While the state derives its name from the historic Edo Kingdom, some stakeholders have argued that the current nomenclature does not adequately capture the multicultural reality of the modern state.
For decades, the issue remained largely confined to academic discussions and community forums. However, renewed conversations around identity, representation, and inclusiveness have brought the subject back into public discourse.
Advocates of a name change argue that no single ethnic nationality should appear to symbolize an entire state comprising many distinct peoples and cultures. They contend that a more geographically or historically neutral name could foster greater unity and a stronger sense of belonging among all communities.
Among the alternatives being suggested, “Midwest State” appears to enjoy the strongest historical foundation. Before the creation of Bendel State and later Edo and Delta States, the region was widely known as the Midwest Region and subsequently Midwest State. Many proponents believe this name carries a shared historical heritage that transcends ethnic boundaries.
Supporters of the Midwest proposal point out that the name predates contemporary ethnic politics and represents a collective identity embraced by various groups that inhabited the former region. To them, restoring the Midwest identity would acknowledge the contributions and histories of all ethnic nationalities within the state.
Others have proposed names such as Heritage State, Unity State, or Niger Heritage State. While these suggestions vary in popularity, they share a common objective: promoting inclusiveness and strengthening social cohesion.
Critics of the proposal, however, maintain that the name Edo State represents a historical civilization and cultural legacy that extends beyond ethnic considerations. They argue that changing the state’s name could create unnecessary political tensions and undermine a heritage that has earned global recognition through the famous Benin Kingdom and its rich cultural achievements.
Political analysts note that any attempt to rename the state would require extensive consultations involving traditional institutions, community leaders, civil society organizations, lawmakers, and the general public. Such a process, they say, should be guided by dialogue, mutual respect, and a commitment to preserving peace and unity.
Regardless of where one stands on the issue, the ongoing conversation highlights a broader national question: How can Nigeria’s diverse communities build identities that celebrate both historical heritage and modern inclusiveness?
As discussions continue, one thing remains certain: the future of the state will be best secured not by division, but by a shared commitment to justice, equity, mutual respect, and peaceful coexistence among all its peoples.
Source: Public discourse and historical records on the former Midwest Region and the creation of Edo State.
Homepage: https://globalegberi.com.ng
Author: Dr. Odimientimi Agbedeyi
About the Author
